- From: Cruikshank, David W <david.w.cruikshank@boeing.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 10:22:37 -0700
- To: "Chris Lilley" <chris@w3.org>, "Lofton Henderson" <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Cc: "WebCGM WG" <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
But the OASIS requirement for when we return is that the log reflect changes since we transitioned to W3C. Do we then have to maintain two versions of the log? Dave Technical Fellow - Graphics/Digital Data Interchange Boeing Commercial Airplane 206.544.3560, fax 206.662.3734 david.w.cruikshank@boeing.com -----Original Message----- From: Chris Lilley [mailto:chris@w3.org] Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 10:21 AM To: Lofton Henderson Cc: WebCGM WG Subject: Re: WebCGM 2.0 PR version is available On Monday, October 2, 2006, 6:36:26 PM, Lofton wrote: LH> 2.) Does this seem like a good time to get rid of D.4 [1]? Does LH> anyone think we should keep that part of the Change Log? Deleting LH> D.4 would mean that the Change Log would then start at OASIS 1st CS / W3C Submission. The change log should list changes since the last document transition (ie, in this case, since *entering CR*). That makes it really short. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Interaction Domain Leader Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Monday, 2 October 2006 17:22:50 UTC