- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 15:15:21 -0600
- To: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>,Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: public-webcgm-wg@w3.org
Okay, let's assume that we do #4 on Thursday. Then it takes about 2 weeks till LC publication date? I.e., a reasonable guess for LC publication date would be about 23nd June (Friday)? So when the letter of #2 is written to the coordination WGs (Cc: "Chairs"), we would announce 23nd June as the anticipated schedule? When should #2 be sent? Does it need to reference the minutes of the Thursday meeting? Do you have a good example of such a letter, which I could just edit? (Or would someone volunteer to ghost write it?) [Similarly ... good example or template for #5 and #10?] For information (everyone) -- I have to leave immediately after the end of the Thursday meeting and will be away for 3 days. I could send an email if it all ready to go. But if it needs minutes location ... then it will have to wait till I return. -Lofton. At 08:09 PM 6/1/2006 +0200, Thierry MICHEL wrote: >Lofton, > >1- WebCGM been a first W3C WD, I need to request to the Director a short >name (publication name) for the Latest version link: > >I propose "webcgm20" as short name (if this is OK with you) > http://www.w3.org/TR/webcgm20/ > >The cover page is almost done (need final URI and LC review ending date). > > >--> Once you have done the final edits on the document. > >2- you should sent a mail to chairs@w3.org to announce the upcoming LC >review schedule and copy the Chairs of groups with dependencies. (send a >heads-up to the Chairs of groups with dependencies, cc'ing chairs@w3.org). >A 5 week LC review would be desirable (minimum been 4 weeks) > >3- I will agin to verify that the document fulfills the Publication rules, >validates correctly XHTML, CSS, no Broken links, etc.) > >4- Then During a telecon we MUST Record the decision that the Group is >OK for moving the draft to Last Call. > >5- You need to send a Transition Request to the Director/CEO: >timbl@w3.org, steve@w3.org, cc'ing w3t-comm@w3.org and chairs@w3.org. > >Once the Director has approved the transition request.(There should not >be any Transition meeting needed for moving to LC (It is strait forward). > >6- I proposed a publication schedule to the Comm team (at least five >days before the publication date mentioned on the spec. > >7- I edit the final publication date in the spec and I install the >document in its final location (TR space) > >8- I send a Publication Request to the Webmaster at webreq@w3.org, >cc'ing the Domain Leader (Chris). > >9- the Webmaster publishes the spec and notifies the Chair and Team >Contact of publication. > >10- Once the spec is published, you send a transition announcement to >chairs@w3.org and the webCGM public mailing list. > >end of story. > >You may have more details here >http://www.w3.org/2005/08/transition?docstatus=fpwdlc-wd-tr > > >My experience is that for this LC step, once you are done with the final >edits on the document, it should take about 10 to 15 days to Request >Transition, Publication request and final publication announcement. > >If you have any questions let me know. > >-- >Thierry Michel >W3C > > > > >
Received on Friday, 2 June 2006 21:15:44 UTC