- From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 18:59:30 +0200
- To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- CC: public-webcgm-wg@w3.org
Lofton, >> >> - Deleted and rewritten this section with conforming statement. (still >> need to state the final end of review date). >> Need also to create a public mailing list public-webcgm-comments@w3.org> >> to collect LC comments > > Do we need that list? What about the list public-webcgm@w3.org? If > that does not suffice for LC comments, then I'm sure what it is for. You are not browsing the latest version of the cover page. To start with I had mentionned "public-webcgm-comments@w3.org", but I did remove it as I guesssed that "public-webcgm@w3.org" was sufficient It says: "The W3C Membership and other interested parties are invited to review the document and send comments through 10 August 2006. Comments must be sent to the public-webcgm@w3.org mailing list (public archive). Use "[LC Review]" in the subject line of your email." > > >> --- Notices section ---- >> >> - Deleted this section. >> Do we need to have it in the spec ? >> if yes it should be moved end of the document. > > To me, it doesn't appear appropriate for the W3C version of the spec, > and it doesn't seem to be required by MoU (whereas OASIS Copyright is > required.) If you have any doubts, perhaps a *quick* check with Rigo. Rigo today confirmed that we should remove this section from the spec, which I had done in the latest version of the cover page. Rigo said we should also remove the OASIS copyright section and replace it with a single copyright statement as follows Copyright © 2006 W3C® (MIT, ERCIM, Keio) and OASIS. All Rights Reserved. W3C liability, trademark and document use rules apply. (with alink to oasis-open.org from the OASIS). I will update the cover page accordingly. -- Thierry Michel W3C
Received on Friday, 2 June 2006 16:59:57 UTC