- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:47:12 -0700
- To: WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
All -- I haven't heard a compelling reason from anyone, whether we should proceed with 11/21 telecon (or not). I have another demand competing for that time slot (as I'm sure you all do, at this busy time), but if people opt for a telecon then I'll be there. So let's decide ... STRAWPOLL: Please write back (to list or to me) and tell me your preference, YES or NO. Majority wins (unless someone points out a compelling reason that we should go with YES). FWIW, as I see the PR and testimonials liaison unfolding, it would appear that it can be handled by email. That would include: a status report or update to the WG; and badgering WG members to produce their testimonials. -Lofton. P.S. The other potential topic is "what next" (for the next 5 months). I would like to see some email discussion on possibilities [1], before it's on a telecon agenda. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2006Nov/0026.html At 09:18 AM 12/14/2006 +0100, Thierry Michel wrote: >Cruikshank, David W wrote: >>It's not our WG internal request I'm talking about. During our telecon >>with Janet and Carol I heard something about the organizationa going out >>with requests to their member companies for testimonials. > >Janet and Carol should be collecting Testimonials and drafting the Press >Release. > >I have ping Janet at our meeting in Japan. She said she will come back to >us shortly. > >>I've working our testimonial through the process here at Boeing.. I just >>expected to be formally asked for one from W3C or OASIS. > >Good to hear that you have lunch the process at Boeing. >Thierry. > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 14 December 2006 23:47:27 UTC