- From: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 19:09:16 +0100
- To: "Cruikshank, David W" <david.w.cruikshank@boeing.com>, Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- CC: WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
Meanwhile, please ask your company about the Testimonial for the Press release. Maybe people could report on status of their testimonials during the next telecon. Thierry Cruikshank, David W wrote: > I guess, it might be ok to have a short telecon to touch base, but it's > unlikely that we can do any business until we get through all WebCGM > processing. > > Thx...Dave > > > Technical Fellow - Graphics/Digital Data Interchange > Boeing Commercial Airplane > 206.544.3560, fax 206.662.3734 > david.w.cruikshank@boeing.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: Lofton Henderson [mailto:lofton@rockynet.com] > Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 6:55 PM > To: WebCGM WG > Subject: CORRECTION -- Re: next WebCGM telecon 22-dec? > > > Sorry, the proposed next telecon date was Thursday, 21st December (not > 22nd)... > > > At 10:47 AM 12/11/2006 -0700, Lofton Henderson wrote: > >> All -- >> >> The minutes omitted ... when should be the next WG telecon? The three >> present on 7-dec thought that 22-dec might be a good idea. If not then > >> ... then it won't happen till after the first of the new year. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> Topics list is still somewhat slim... >> >> 1.) status report (mostly OASIS progression, which is expected to be in > >> OS ballot by then). >> >> 2.) status of joint press release, testimonials -- it's in Janet's and >> Carol's hands now. Whether there is anything that we (the WG) need to >> do about it in the near future is uncertain. >> >> 3.) another WG F2F? The first question to answer is: what WG work is >> there for a F2F? We think that the OASIS TC will probably want to meet > >> early in the year, and the possibility would exist for a joint meeting. > >> (Tho' that would probably take a couple years to get mgmt approval, if >> it were actually presented as a "joint meeting".) >> >> 4.) work plan for the WG from now till 5/31/07, when Charter expires. >> How should WG spend these 5 months? See [13], [13] >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2006Nov/0026.html >> >> Regards, >> -Lofton. >> >> >> At 06:27 PM 12/7/2006 -0700, Lofton Henderson wrote: >> >> >>> WebCGM WG -- >>> >>> The minutes are at >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/Minutes/2006/12/07-webcgm-minutes >>> .html >>> >>> and also available as text, below. >>> >>> [1]W3C >>> >>> [1] http://www.w3.org/ >>> >>> - DRAFT - >>> >>> WebCGM WG >>> >>> 7 Dec 2006 >>> >>> [2]Agenda >>> >>> [2] >>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2006Dec/0001 >>> >>> See also: [3]IRC log >>> >>> [3] http://www.w3.org/2006/12/07-webcgm-irc >>> >>> Attendees >>> >>> Present >>> Lofton, Dave, Stuart >>> >>> Regrets >>> Thierry, Dieter, Benoit >>> >>> Absent >>> Don, Chris >>> >>> Chair >>> Lofton >>> >>> Scribe >>> Dave >>> >>> Contents >>> >>> * [4]Topics >>> 1. [5]roll call 11:00am ET, membership, agenda >>> 2. [6]routine WG business >>> 3. [7]report on spec status in OASIS >>> 4. [8]report on spec status in W3C >>> 5. [9]Press Release and Testimonials >>> 6. [10]Future work in WG >>> 7. [11]Do we plan to have another F2F? >>> * [12]Summary of Action Items >>> _________________________________________________________ >>> >>> >>> >>> <scribe> Scribe: Dave >>> >>> <lofton> zakim this is WebCGM >>> >>> roll call 11:00am ET, membership, agenda >>> >>> routine WG business >>> >>> none >>> >>> report on spec status in OASIS >>> >>> <lofton> (On roll call -- no quorum) >>> >>> 2 week OASIS review has started >>> >>> <lofton> OS ballot starts on Dec 16th >>> >>> report on spec status in W3C >>> >>> <lofton> According to Thierry, all was positive. >>> >>> Press Release and Testimonials >>> >>> <lofton> It's in the hands of Carol and Janet, and we have no >>> further information. >>> >>> Future work in WG >>> >>> <lofton> I suggest that we postpone this till we have a quorum, >>> except... >>> >>> see: >>> > [13]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2006Nov/002 >>> 6.html >>> >>> [13] >>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2006Nov/0026.htm >>> l >>> >>> <lofton> what do we three think about "supersede"? >>> >>> <lofton> Agreed: 2.0 does NOT supersede 1.0. Thierry (in email) >>> agreed with this. >>> >>> <lofton> Postpone rest of this topic till later. >>> >>> Do we plan to have another F2F? >>> >>> <lofton> What WG work is there that would suggest a F2F? >>> >>> <lofton> (Need to answer that question first -- email dialog >>> needed.) >>> >>> Ajourned: 11:25 EST >>> >>> Summary of Action Items >>> >>> [End of minutes] >>> _________________________________________________________ >>> >>> >>> Minutes formatted by David Booth's [14]scribe.perl version 1.127 >>> ([15]CVS log) >>> $Date: 2006/12/08 01:25:08 $ >>> _________________________________________________________ >>> >>> [14] > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm >>> [15] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/ >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 12 December 2006 18:09:37 UTC