- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:47:03 -0700
- To: WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
All -- The minutes omitted ... when should be the next WG telecon? The three present on 7-dec thought that 22-dec might be a good idea. If not then ... then it won't happen till after the first of the new year. Thoughts? Topics list is still somewhat slim... 1.) status report (mostly OASIS progression, which is expected to be in OS ballot by then). 2.) status of joint press release, testimonials -- it's in Janet's and Carol's hands now. Whether there is anything that we (the WG) need to do about it in the near future is uncertain. 3.) another WG F2F? The first question to answer is: what WG work is there for a F2F? We think that the OASIS TC will probably want to meet early in the year, and the possibility would exist for a joint meeting. (Tho' that would probably take a couple years to get mgmt approval, if it were actually presented as a "joint meeting".) 4.) work plan for the WG from now till 5/31/07, when Charter expires. How should WG spend these 5 months? See [13], [13] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2006Nov/0026.html Regards, -Lofton. At 06:27 PM 12/7/2006 -0700, Lofton Henderson wrote: >WebCGM WG -- > >The minutes are at > >http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/Minutes/2006/12/07-webcgm-minutes.html > >and also available as text, below. > > [1]W3C > > [1] http://www.w3.org/ > > - DRAFT - > > WebCGM WG > > 7 Dec 2006 > > [2]Agenda > > [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2006Dec/0001 > > See also: [3]IRC log > > [3] http://www.w3.org/2006/12/07-webcgm-irc > >Attendees > > Present > Lofton, Dave, Stuart > > Regrets > Thierry, Dieter, Benoit > > Absent > Don, Chris > > Chair > Lofton > > Scribe > Dave > >Contents > > * [4]Topics > 1. [5]roll call 11:00am ET, membership, agenda > 2. [6]routine WG business > 3. [7]report on spec status in OASIS > 4. [8]report on spec status in W3C > 5. [9]Press Release and Testimonials > 6. [10]Future work in WG > 7. [11]Do we plan to have another F2F? > * [12]Summary of Action Items > _________________________________________________________ > > > > <scribe> Scribe: Dave > > <lofton> zakim this is WebCGM > >roll call 11:00am ET, membership, agenda > >routine WG business > > none > >report on spec status in OASIS > > <lofton> (On roll call -- no quorum) > > 2 week OASIS review has started > > <lofton> OS ballot starts on Dec 16th > >report on spec status in W3C > > <lofton> According to Thierry, all was positive. > >Press Release and Testimonials > > <lofton> It's in the hands of Carol and Janet, and we have no > further information. > >Future work in WG > > <lofton> I suggest that we postpone this till we have a quorum, > except... > > see: > [13]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2006Nov/002 > 6.html > > [13] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2006Nov/0026.html > > <lofton> what do we three think about "supersede"? > > <lofton> Agreed: 2.0 does NOT supersede 1.0. Thierry (in email) > agreed with this. > > <lofton> Postpone rest of this topic till later. > >Do we plan to have another F2F? > > <lofton> What WG work is there that would suggest a F2F? > > <lofton> (Need to answer that question first -- email dialog > needed.) > > Ajourned: 11:25 EST > >Summary of Action Items > > [End of minutes] > _________________________________________________________ > > > Minutes formatted by David Booth's [14]scribe.perl version 1.127 > ([15]CVS log) > $Date: 2006/12/08 01:25:08 $ > _________________________________________________________ > > [14] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm > [15] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/ > > > > >
Received on Monday, 11 December 2006 17:47:59 UTC