Re: [webauthn] Add packed attestation optional firmware version attribute (#1953)

> But are we going to include the whole certificate in the example? Currently we only have an example like the second listing in my [previous comment](https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1953#issuecomment-1740742591). For that example you can just omit the sernum part, the three sections are independent.

I figure a signature is useful in the Base64-encoded section for someone to look at via tooling, but worth omitting in the textual view. I'll update the PR to show your example now.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by dwaite
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1953#issuecomment-1758165875 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Wednesday, 11 October 2023 17:33:44 UTC