[webauthn] getClientExtensionResults returns nil in Safari 15.4 (#1715)
- Re: [webauthn] getClientExtensionResults returns nil in Safari 15.4 (#1715)
- Re: [webauthn] getClientExtensionResults returns nil in Safari 15.4 (#1715)
- Closed: [webauthn] getClientExtensionResults returns nil in Safari 15.4 (#1715)
[webauthn] Provide an explicit way to opt out of multi-device syncing/backups (#1714)
- Re: [webauthn] Provide an explicit way to opt out of multi-device syncing/backups (#1714)
- Re: [webauthn] Provide an explicit way to opt out of multi-device syncing/backups (#1714)
- Re: [webauthn] Provide an explicit way to opt out of multi-device syncing/backups (#1714)
- Re: [webauthn] Provide an explicit way to opt out of multi-device syncing/backups (#1714)
- Re: [webauthn] Provide an explicit way to opt out of multi-device syncing/backups (#1714)
- Re: [webauthn] Provide an explicit way to opt out of multi-device syncing/backups (#1714)
- Re: [webauthn] Provide an explicit way to opt out of multi-device syncing/backups (#1714)
- Re: [webauthn] Provide an explicit way to opt out of multi-device syncing/backups (#1714)
- Re: [webauthn] Provide an explicit way to opt out of multi-device syncing/backups (#1714)
- Re: [webauthn] Provide an explicit way to opt out of multi-device syncing/backups (#1714)
- Re: [webauthn] Provide an explicit way to opt out of multi-device syncing/backups (#1714)
- Re: [webauthn] Provide an explicit way to opt out of multi-device syncing/backups (#1714)
- Re: [webauthn] Provide an explicit way to opt out of multi-device syncing/backups (#1714)
- Re: [webauthn] Provide an explicit way to opt out of multi-device syncing/backups (#1714)
- Re: [webauthn] Provide an explicit way to opt out of multi-device syncing/backups (#1714)
- Re: [webauthn] Provide an explicit way to opt out of multi-device syncing/backups (#1714)
- Re: [webauthn] Provide an explicit way to opt out of multi-device syncing/backups (#1714)
- Re: [webauthn] Provide an explicit way to opt out of multi-device syncing/backups (#1714)
- Re: [webauthn] Provide an explicit way to opt out of multi-device syncing/backups (#1714)
Weekly github digest (WebAuthn)
Re: [webauthn] Move PRF Extension into its own specification (#1462)
[webauthn] Process to report non-compliant credentials (#1713)
- Re: [webauthn] Process to report non-compliant credentials (#1713)
- Re: [webauthn] Process to report non-compliant credentials (#1713)
- Re: [webauthn] Process to report non-compliant credentials (#1713)
[webauthn] getTransports() should return string instead of Array of String's (#1712)
- Re: [webauthn] getTransports() should return string instead of Array of string's (#1712)
- Re: [webauthn] getTransports() should return string instead of Array of string's (#1712)
- Closed: [webauthn] getTransports() should return string instead of Array of string's (#1712)
WebAuthn June Hybrid F2F Registration
Re: [webauthn] non-modal "conditionally mediated" UI (#1576)
- Re: [webauthn] non-modal "conditionally mediated" UI (#1576)
- Re: [webauthn] non-modal "conditionally mediated" UI (#1576)
- Re: [webauthn] non-modal "conditionally mediated" UI (#1576)
- Re: [webauthn] non-modal "conditionally mediated" UI (#1576)
- Re: [webauthn] non-modal "conditionally mediated" UI (#1576)
Re: [webauthn] Add registration/authentication extensions for cloud-assisted BLE (#909)
[w3c/webauthn] f14523: further WIP re fixing #1701 authnr nonce, & noting...
[webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
[w3c/webauthn] 22a796: Split up options methods into two sections
[webauthn] new commits pushed by MasterKale
[w3c/webauthn] c0c945: Remove required from property with default value
[webauthn] new commits pushed by MasterKale
[w3c/webauthn] 078e43: Move JSON xmp out of PublicKeyCredential dl
[webauthn] new commits pushed by MasterKale
[w3c/webauthn] 4a904a: Refine definition of `toJSON()` method
[webauthn] new commits pushed by MasterKale
[w3c/webauthn] e11e51: Remove notes rationalizing new API existence
[webauthn] new commits pushed by MasterKale
[webauthn] RP operations: some extension processing may assume that the encompassing signature is valid (#1711)
Re: [webauthn] Support `discoverableCredential` field in the API. (#1565)
- Re: [webauthn] Support `discoverableCredential` field in the API. (#1565)
- Re: [webauthn] Support `discoverableCredential` field in the API. (#1565)
- Re: [webauthn] Support `discoverableCredential` field in the API. (#1565)
- Re: [webauthn] Support `discoverableCredential` field in the API. (#1565)
- Re: [webauthn] Support `discoverableCredential` field in the API. (#1565)
- Re: [webauthn] Support `discoverableCredential` field in the API. (#1565)
[webauthn] Split RP ops "Registering a new credential" into one with and one without attestation (#1710)
- Re: [webauthn] Split RP ops "Registering a new credential" into one with and one without attestation (#1710)
- Re: [webauthn] Split RP ops "Registering a new credential" into one with and one without attestation (#1710)
- Re: [webauthn] Split RP ops "Registering a new credential" into one with and one without attestation (#1710)
- Re: [webauthn] Split RP ops "Registering a new credential" into one with and one without attestation (#1710)
- Re: [webauthn] Split RP ops "Registering a new credential" into one with and one without attestation (#1710)
- Re: [webauthn] Split RP ops "Registering a new credential" into one with and one without attestation (#1710)
[webauthn] Why not make things simple? (#1709)
- Re: [webauthn] Why not make things simple? (#1709)
- Re: [webauthn] Why not make things simple? (#1709)
- Re: [webauthn] Why not make things simple? (#1709)
- Re: [webauthn] Why not make things simple? (#1709)
- Re: [webauthn] Why not make things simple? (#1709)
- Re: [webauthn] Why not make things simple? (#1709)
- Re: [webauthn] Why not make things simple? (#1709)
- Re: [webauthn] Why not make things simple? (#1709)
Weekly github digest (WebAuthn)
[w3c/webauthn] f0fe8f: rough WIP to fix issue #1701 side-channel attack
[webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
[webauthn] Advice on language to use? (#1708)
- Re: [webauthn] Advice on language to use? (#1708)
- Re: [webauthn] Advice on language to use? (#1708)
- Re: [webauthn] Advice on language to use? (#1708)
- Re: [webauthn] Advice on language to use? (#1708)
- Re: [webauthn] Advice on language to use? (#1708)
- Re: [webauthn] Advice on language to use? (#1708)
- Re: [webauthn] Advice on language to use? (#1708)
- Re: [webauthn] Advice on language to use? (#1708)
[webauthn] use "public key credential source" consistently (#1707)
Re: [webauthn] Backup state of credentials (#1692)
[w3c/webauthn] 273029: incop & massage Emlun's suggestion, thx!
[webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
Weekly github digest (WebAuthn)
[webauthn] Pull Request: Updates based on DOM's abort reason
- Re: [webauthn] Updates based on DOM's abort reason (#1706)
- Re: [webauthn] Updates based on DOM's abort reason (#1706)
- Re: [webauthn] Updates based on DOM's abort reason (#1706)
- Re: [webauthn] Updates based on DOM's abort reason (#1706)
[webauthn] Switch to permissive copyright license? (#1705)
Re: [webauthn] FIDO credential decommissioning (#1696)
Re: [webauthn] Change UV check step from passive to active voice (#1704)
[w3c/webauthn] 22e23f: added backup eligibility and state to section 7
[webauthn] new commits pushed by timcappalli
[w3c/webauthn] 41380b: reference new definitions in authData bit mapping ...
[webauthn] new commits pushed by timcappalli
[w3c/webauthn] e796fa: definitions for backup eligibility and state
[webauthn] new commits pushed by timcappalli
[w3c/webauthn] 619ebb: wordsmithing, thx emlun!
[webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
03/09/2022 W3C Web Authentication Meeting
Weekly github digest (WebAuthn)
Re: [webauthn] Cross origin authentication without iframes (accommodating SPC in WebAuthn) (#1667)
- Re: [webauthn] Cross origin authentication without iframes (accommodating SPC in WebAuthn) (#1667)
- Re: [webauthn] Cross origin authentication without iframes (accommodating SPC in WebAuthn) (#1667)
[w3c/webauthn] b4e8d0: clarification
[webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
Re: [webauthn] device public key extension (#1663)
[w3c/webauthn] 17f3aa: update 'Relying Party Usage' section and note curr...
[webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
[w3c/webauthn] c1aef2: Mark arguments required
[webauthn] new commits pushed by MasterKale
Re: [webauthn] New PublicKeyCredential methods for JSON (de)serialization (#1703)
- Re: [webauthn] New PublicKeyCredential methods for JSON (de)serialization (#1703)
- Re: [webauthn] New PublicKeyCredential methods for JSON (de)serialization (#1703)
- Re: [webauthn] New PublicKeyCredential methods for JSON (de)serialization (#1703)
- Re: [webauthn] New PublicKeyCredential methods for JSON (de)serialization (#1703)
- Re: [webauthn] New PublicKeyCredential methods for JSON (de)serialization (#1703)
- Re: [webauthn] New PublicKeyCredential methods for JSON (de)serialization (#1703)
- Re: [webauthn] New PublicKeyCredential methods for JSON (de)serialization (#1703)
- Re: [webauthn] New PublicKeyCredential methods for JSON (de)serialization (#1703)
- Re: [webauthn] New PublicKeyCredential methods for JSON (de)serialization (#1703)
- Re: [webauthn] New PublicKeyCredential methods for JSON (de)serialization (#1703)
- Re: [webauthn] New PublicKeyCredential methods for JSON (de)serialization (#1703)
- Re: [webauthn] New PublicKeyCredential methods for JSON (de)serialization (#1703)