- From: David Waite via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2022 19:37:04 +0000
- To: public-webauthn@w3.org
> > I'd lean toward having the method take JSON text - this would both increase symmetry with the toJSON()method, and allow us to declare the operation of the method in terms of prose rather than IDL. > > Huh, so if the input is JSON then you don't need WebIDL definitions for it? I approached it as though I was writing something akin to TypeScript definitions for these methods. You're right - toJSON() emits Objects not Strings, so the current IDL is proper. -- GitHub Notification of comment by dwaite Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1703#issuecomment-1061060518 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 7 March 2022 19:37:06 UTC