- From: =JeffH via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2021 23:29:54 +0000
- To: public-webauthn@w3.org
> I don't think any change is necessary [ ... ] Fine by me, especially given where we are in the process for completing L2. Like I said above, we _could_ clarify it "...if we want/need to be pedantically clear...", implying I don't feel its fully necessary. > ...the name "attested credential data" for the sub-datastructure is a bit unfortunate, since it doesn't really have much to do with attestation. FWIW, I disagree. That "sub-datastructure" (i.e., [attested credential data](https://w3c.github.io/webauthn/#attested-credential-data)) is data signed by the [attestation private key](https://w3c.github.io/webauthn/#attestation-private-key), and hence is "_attested_" by said private key. See also [figure 6](https://w3c.github.io/webauthn/#fig-attStructs) "attestation object". We also use the phrase "attested [credential public key](https://w3c.github.io/webauthn/#credential-public-key)" in a couple places. -- GitHub Notification of comment by equalsJeffH Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1555#issuecomment-772898971 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 3 February 2021 23:30:03 UTC