- From: John Bradley via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2020 17:52:31 +0000
- To: public-webauthn@w3.org
Is chrome sill adding ED256 to the list of algs if it is not present in the request from the RP? A RP not supporting ED256 also seems like a generally bad idea. Perhaps if the RP asks for anything other than ED256 as the first preference treating it as uv preferred may be better than falling back to U2F. -- GitHub Notification of comment by ve7jtb Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1437#issuecomment-640779179 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 8 June 2020 17:52:37 UTC