Re: [webauthn] Add RP conformance section on ignoring attestation

Yeah, those thoughts had crossed my mind as well. How much of it do you think should go in security considerations instead: both the list of benefits and the subsection, or just the subsection?

...Actually, I'll go ahead and pre-emptively draft a move of all of it to security considerations, as that seems more appropriate.

And yes, I too imagine this as a PR issue rather than CR.

GitHub Notification of comment by emlun
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Monday, 12 March 2018 17:19:16 UTC