Re: [webauthn] Specify extension types in listing instead of prose

In reviewing the rendered diff myself, I realize there are two orthogonal "type" concepts for extensions: the registration/authentication type (which this PR is about) and the client/authenticator type. Perhaps a different term should be used to pre-empt confusion between the two, although it seems they're currently never referred to as "types" in the spec.

GitHub Notification of comment by emlun
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 7 June 2018 15:32:47 UTC