W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webauthn@w3.org > September 2017

Re: [webauthn] should authenticatorExtensions really be a dictionary?

From: Anthony Nadalin via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2017 19:03:35 +0000
To: public-webauthn@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-328188169-1504897406-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

@selfissued since you went through the extensions please review 

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by nadalin
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/550#issuecomment-328188169 using your GitHub account

Received on Friday, 8 September 2017 19:03:31 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Anthony Nadalin via GitHub: "Re: [webauthn] "Authenticator extension processing" is likely wrong"
Previous message: Emil Lundberg via GitHub: "Re: [webauthn] Sign counter alg 507"
In reply to: balfanz via GitHub: "[webauthn] should authenticatorExtensions really be a dictionary?"
Next in thread: balfanz via GitHub: "Re: [webauthn] should authenticatorExtensions really be a dictionary?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 07:26:27 UTC