- From: J.C. Jones via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 01:47:58 +0000
- To: public-webauthn@w3.org
Making `id` optional for future expandability seems reasonable. I think the language updates around usage are already handled. For example, using a credential right now says (emphasis mine): > This optional member contains a list of PublicKeyCredentialDescriptor object representing public key credentials **acceptable to the caller, in decending order of the caller’s preference** (the first item in the list is the most preferred credential, and so on down the line). (ExcludeList looks fine as it's written now, too) So I'd support a PR that marks `PublicKeyCredentialDescriptor.id` optional. I could go either way about adding the note to PublicKeyCredentialType to the effect that `PublicKeyCredentialDescriptor.id` is mandatory for `"public-key"` types, because I feel like it's self-evident when you have a key handle. -- GitHub Notification of comment by jcjones Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/245#issuecomment-302277978 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 18 May 2017 01:48:05 UTC