- From: Ian Kilpatrick via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 23:59:46 +0000
- To: public-webauthn@w3.org
bfgeek has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/webauthn: == "rp" isn't a widely enough known acronym?, should be relyingParting instead? == This is pure bikeshedding, but I wonder if "rp" is a widely enough known acronym? I'd argue not, and attributes should expand this, e.g. https://w3c.github.io/webauthn/#dom-assertionoptions-rpid relyingPartyId https://w3c.github.io/webauthn/#dom-scopedcredentialoptions-rpid relyingPartyId https://w3c.github.io/webauthn/#dom-account-rpdisplayname relyingPartyDisplayName Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/325 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 20 January 2017 23:59:52 UTC