- From: Jeffrey Yasskin via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 07:14:54 +0000
- To: public-webauthn@w3.org
FWIW, I'd endorse @equalsJeffH's proposal in https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/257#issuecomment-268403199 (which @domenic also endorsed) to have this spec's editor's draft reference the WHATWG HTML spec, and then redirect the references for the more formal publication steps. Even if HTML5.2 picks up all the bugfixes made in the WHATWG spec (which we should keep pushing for), it'll lag a bit, which will impede changes like #319. The changes at CR should just consist of adding an anchors block with all the HTML references, and might be even smaller if Bikeshed grows an automated way to do that, maybe related to https://tabatkins.github.io/bikeshed/#metadata-default-biblio-status. (@tabatkins?) Assuming HTML5.2 keeps doing a good job of tracking the WHATWG spec, there shouldn't be any need for rewriting. -- GitHub Notification of comment by jyasskin Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/257#issuecomment-281588709 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2017 07:15:01 UTC