Re: [webauthn] Fix #622: Clarify PublicKeyCredentialEntity name descriptions

We are extrapolating what RP's can and will do. Empty/Bogus value don't provide any value. Same can be said about displayName and making this required just make it confusing. 

Best is to stay consistent with CTAP spec. I don't see any reason departing from CTAP spec and I don't agree with making user.name as a required parameter. 

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by akshayku
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/666#issuecomment-354520413 using your GitHub account

Received on Saturday, 30 December 2017 01:35:50 UTC