- From: Mike Jones via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 18:52:50 +0000
- To: public-webauthn@w3.org
rp.name is the friendly name "e.g. "Acme Corporation", "Widgets, Inc.", or "Awesome Site"". user.name is the friendly name, currently "e.g., "john.p.smith@example.com", or "John P. Smith"", - which I'm proposing to change to "e.g. "John P. Smith"". It is consistent to have both "name" entries be the friendly name. That's why I introduced detailedName "e.g., "john.p.smith@example.com"" - to carry the missing unique-at-the-RP account identifier. Do you have a specific counter-proposal? If so, what new names would rp.name (friendly name), user.name (friendly name), and user.detailedName (detailed name) have? -- GitHub Notification of comment by selfissued Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/413#issuecomment-296788518 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 24 April 2017 18:52:56 UTC