- From: Mike West via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 19:00:44 +0000
- To: public-webauthn@w3.org
> That's why I introduced detailedName "e.g., "john.p.smith@example.com"" - to carry the missing unique-at-the-RP account identifier. Is that not `user.id`? I guess `user.id` could be your internal guid (say, I'm user `375632531`), `user.name` could be a username (`mkwst@google.com`), and `detailedName` could be a friendly name (`Mike West`). Does the authenticator need all these to render something useful for its UI? If we need all these things, then sure, let's support them. I'm just unclear on the need. :) -- GitHub Notification of comment by mikewest Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/413#issuecomment-296790654 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 24 April 2017 19:00:52 UTC