W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webauthn@w3.org > September 2016

Re: Proposed blog post announcing second public draft

From: Sampath Srinivas <samsrinivas@google.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2016 06:21:23 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMWEEgWaMOmk01YTN+XUtHEjWEw7HLYN23jU9VdYuh65+H7yUA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
Cc: "public-webauthn@w3.org" <public-webauthn@w3.org>, Anthony Nadalin <tonynad@microsoft.com>, Richard Barnes <rbarnes@mozilla.com>, Samuel Weiler <weiler@w3.org>, Vijay Bharadwaj <vijaybh@microsoft.com>
Why not leave out "(all of which are optional)"?

Though we from Google are passionately dedicated to that fact and will
fight on the beaches, in the fields, and in the streets to preserve that
liberty, it seems like an un-necessary detail in a TL;DR summary.

The interested reader will, no doubt, find out when reading the doc.

Sam (Srinivas)

On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
wrote:

> How about this for the blog post?  Particularly, if there are other
> changes we’d like to highlight, please let me know what they are.  I’ll
> plan to post on Tuesday (after the US Labor Day holiday on Monday).
>
>
>
>                                                                 -- Mike
>
>
>
> *Second public draft of W3C Web Authentication Specification*
>
>
>
> The W3C Web Authentication working group
> <https://www.w3.org/blog/webauthn/> is pleased to announce publication of
> the second public draft of the W3C Web Authentication specification
> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-webauthn-20160902/>.  While this W3C
> Working Draft is similar in most respects to the First Public Working
> Draft <http://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-webauthn-20160531/>, it contains
> numerous refinements intended to enhance the readability and clarity of the
> specification.  These resulted from extensive ongoing review of the first
> public draft.  Changes include separating the authenticator model from the
> defined attestation formats, clarifying the use of extensions (all of which
> are optional), and defining some additional extensions.  Thanks to all of
> you who reviewed the first public draft!
>
>
>
> We solicit your continued feedback – especially feedback based on
> implementation.  If you’re not already a member, you can join the public
> working group mailing list at https://lists.w3.org/Archives/
> Public/public-webauthn/.  The working group expects that the next public
> draft will be a Candidate Recommendation.  So keep the great feedback
> coming!
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Samuel Weiler [mailto:weiler@w3.org]
> Sent: Friday, September 2, 2016 5:37 PM
> To: public-webauthn@w3.org
> Subject: Re: WD-01 is now published
>
>
>
> Indeed, thanks to Vijay for pushing that through!
>
>
>
> On 9/2/16 7:07 PM, Mike Jones wrote:
>
>
>
> > Are we going to make a public announcement about this on our blog at
>
> > https://www.w3.org/blog/webauthn/?  Should I work on proposed text or
>
> > someone already on that?
>
>
>
> I don't have a plan for a post, but it sounds like a good idea.  Sure,
> send text.  :-)
>
>
>
> -- Sam
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Saturday, 3 September 2016 13:22:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 07:26:22 UTC