RE: Are you okay with the opaque Token Binding IDs now? from Vijay Bharadwaj on 2016-09-02 (public-webauthn@w3.org from September 2016)

From: Vijay Bharadwaj <vijaybh@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 18:55:04 +0000
To: Dirk Balfanz <balfanz@google.com>, W3C WebAuthn WG <public-webauthn@w3.org>
Message-ID: <4c3eb07b0ef649678f87ac7c16e3e91d@microsoft.com>

CC:ing the list per Jeff’s reminder.

From: Dirk Balfanz [mailto:balfanz@google.com]
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2016 12:25 AM
To: Vijay Bharadwaj <vijaybh@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: Are you okay with the opaque Token Binding IDs now?

Yup. Go ahead and merge that PR for webauthn.

Dirk.

On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 12:20 AM Vijay Bharadwaj <vijaybh@microsoft.com<mailto:vijaybh@microsoft.com>> wrote:
Noticed the discussion in https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/unbearable/current/msg00803.html and the ensuing thread. Seems like this converged on treating TB ID as opaque at least in the WebAuthn client. Is that your opinion as well?

Received on Friday, 2 September 2016 18:55:52 UTC