W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webauthn@w3.org > November 2016

Re: [webauthn] Can the "attestation" of a WebAuthnAttestation be a non-object?

From: =JeffH via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 02:08:45 +0000
To: public-webauthn@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-258731921-1478484524-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

Instead of `any` might we declare it `object` (that would be correct 
idl-wise?) ?

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by equalsJeffH
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/289#issuecomment-258731921 
using your GitHub account

Received on Monday, 7 November 2016 02:08:52 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: =JeffH via GitHub: "Re: [webauthn] Why are various predefined extensions defined as extensions, and not just parts of the spec?"
Previous message: =JeffH via GitHub: "Re: [webauthn] Why are some of the attestation interfaces [SecureContext] while others are not?"
In reply to: Boris Zbarsky via GitHub: "[webauthn] Can the "attestation" of a WebAuthnAttestation be a non-object?"
Next in thread: Boris Zbarsky via GitHub: "Re: [webauthn] Can the "attestation" of a WebAuthnAttestation be a non-object?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 07:26:23 UTC