W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webauthn@w3.org > November 2016

Re: [webauthn] Can the "attestation" of a WebAuthnAttestation be a non-object?

From: Boris Zbarsky via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 02:59:57 +0000
To: public-webauthn@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-258736977-1478487596-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

`object` would be correct if it's always guaranteed to be an object, 
yes.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by bzbarsky
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/289#issuecomment-258736977 
using your GitHub account

Received on Monday, 7 November 2016 03:00:08 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Anne van Kesteren via GitHub: "Re: [webauthn] Need to clearly define what it means to SHA-256 hash the "host" output of the document.domain setter"
Previous message: Boris Zbarsky via GitHub: "Re: [webauthn] Various attributes of ScopedCredentialInfo should probably be [SameObject]"
In reply to: Boris Zbarsky via GitHub: "[webauthn] Can the "attestation" of a WebAuthnAttestation be a non-object?"
Next in thread: Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub: "Re: [webauthn] Can the "attestation" of a WebAuthnAttestation be a non-object?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 07:26:23 UTC