- From: Richard Barnes <rbarnes@mozilla.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 13:17:54 -0400
- To: Rolf Lindemann <rlindemann@noknok.com>
- Cc: Vijay Bharadwaj <vijaybh@microsoft.com>, W3C WebAuthn WG <public-webauthn@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAOAcki9-8H66zKA3DHFUNZv3h-J5oo--o_knhc0WdUgV4CCcGA@mail.gmail.com>
I don't think that's really helpful. Why should that be the case? On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Rolf Lindemann <rlindemann@noknok.com> wrote: > E.g. Add: "In order to provide best interoperability, clients should at > least pass-through the extensions defined in this document." > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Vijay Bharadwaj [mailto:vijaybh@microsoft.com] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 22. Juni 2016 19:06 > An: Rolf Lindemann; public-webauthn@w3.org > Betreff: RE: [webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh > > Suggested wording? > > I did add the sentence in Section 7 encouraging implementation of the > pre-defined extensions. Does that work for you? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rolf Lindemann [mailto:rlindemann@noknok.com] > Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2016 9:59 AM > To: 'Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub' <sysbot+gh@w3.org>; > public-webauthn@w3.org > Subject: AW: [webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh > > I would prefer more encouragement to Client implementers for > passing-through extensions - at least the ones defined in the webauthn spec. > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub [mailto:sysbot+gh@w3.org] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 22. Juni 2016 18:08 > An: public-webauthn@w3.org > Betreff: [webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh > > > The following commits were just pushed by vijaybh to > https://github.com/w3c/webauthn: > > * Wordsmithing prose around client pass-through of extensions > by Vijay Bharadwaj > > https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/commit/69b8763f10fc5af051165dc7bfdeff4bd0409d9d > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 22 June 2016 17:18:25 UTC