W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webauthn@w3.org > June 2016

AW: [webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh

From: Rolf Lindemann <rlindemann@noknok.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 19:09:45 +0200
To: "'Vijay Bharadwaj'" <vijaybh@microsoft.com>, "'Rolf Lindemann'" <rlindemann@noknok.com>, <public-webauthn@w3.org>
Message-ID: <046e01d1cca8$e0de4490$a29acdb0$@noknok.com>
E.g. Add: "In order to provide best interoperability, clients should at least pass-through the extensions defined in this document."

-----Urspr√ľngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Vijay Bharadwaj [mailto:vijaybh@microsoft.com] 
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 22. Juni 2016 19:06
An: Rolf Lindemann; public-webauthn@w3.org
Betreff: RE: [webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh

Suggested wording?

I did add the sentence in Section 7 encouraging implementation of the pre-defined extensions. Does that work for you?

-----Original Message-----
From: Rolf Lindemann [mailto:rlindemann@noknok.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2016 9:59 AM
To: 'Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub' <sysbot+gh@w3.org>; public-webauthn@w3.org
Subject: AW: [webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh

I would prefer more encouragement to Client implementers for passing-through extensions - at least the ones defined in the webauthn spec.

-----Urspr√ľngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Vijay Bharadwaj via GitHub [mailto:sysbot+gh@w3.org] 
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 22. Juni 2016 18:08
An: public-webauthn@w3.org
Betreff: [webauthn] new commits pushed by vijaybh

The following commits were just pushed by vijaybh to 

* Wordsmithing prose around client pass-through of extensions
  by Vijay Bharadwaj
Received on Wednesday, 22 June 2016 17:09:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 07:26:21 UTC