Re: Notes from WebAuthn Review

On 6/1/16, 11:14 AM, "Adam Powers" <adam@fidoalliance.org<mailto:adam@fidoalliance.org>> wrote:

With all the various threads I've lost track of whether these comments have been addressed or not. Let me know if they should be on master at this point, on a branch, or still on the back burner.

funny u shud ask.... as it turns out, I have been working to get your comments into a form (plain text :) where they can be more easily replied to and discussed here on the mailing list.  I anticipate sending that to the list later today or tomorrow.

HTH,

=JeffH





On May 21, 2016 at 2:20:12 PM, Vijay Bharadwaj (vijaybh@microsoft.com<mailto:vijaybh@microsoft.com>) wrote:
I'm not sure that it's efficient to file new issues for each comment, and a lot of these are things where I think the right fix would be somewhere other than the place you get confused - essentially the text should have led in better to the statement that actually tripped you up.

How about we do this in a more iterative way? I can create a branch next week and maybe we can do some back-and-forth editing to see if we can refine the text. WDYT?

From: Adam Powers [mailto:adam@fidoalliance.org<mailto:adam@fidoalliance.org>]
Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2016 8:42 AM
To: W3C Web Authn WG <public-webauthn@w3.org<mailto:public-webauthn@w3.org>>
Subject: Notes from WebAuthn Review

Hi all,

During the face to face in Berlin I had raised my hand to read through the review draft of the spec and provide comments. I tried to approach this as if I were a first-time reader and think about what things might trip up an implementer.

Attached are my annotations in PDF - sorry for the weird format, but I did my reading / reviewing in Evernote while sitting on a plane.

Let me know if I should drop these into a GitHub issue or if there's some better way to provide feedback.

Thanks,
Adam