RE: Notes from WebAuthn Review

With all the various threads I've lost track of whether these comments have
been addressed or not. Let me know if they should be on master at this
point, on a branch, or still on the back burner.

If it would help, I would be happy to summarize and prioritize some of the
issues I saw.

Thanks,
Adam

On May 21, 2016 at 2:20:12 PM, Vijay Bharadwaj (vijaybh@microsoft.com)
wrote:

> I’m not sure that it’s efficient to file new issues for each comment, and
> a lot of these are things where I think the right fix would be somewhere
> other than the place you get confused – essentially the text should have
> led in better to the statement that actually tripped you up.
>
>
>
> How about we do this in a more iterative way? I can create a branch next
> week and maybe we can do some back-and-forth editing to see if we can
> refine the text. WDYT?
>
>
>
> *From:* Adam Powers [mailto:adam@fidoalliance.org]
> *Sent:* Saturday, May 21, 2016 8:42 AM
> *To:* W3C Web Authn WG <public-webauthn@w3.org>
> *Subject:* Notes from WebAuthn Review
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> During the face to face in Berlin I had raised my hand to read through the
> review draft of the spec and provide comments. I tried to approach this as
> if I were a first-time reader and think about what things might trip up an
> implementer.
>
>
>
> Attached are my annotations in PDF — sorry for the weird format, but I did
> my reading / reviewing in Evernote while sitting on a plane.
>
>
>
> Let me know if I should drop these into a GitHub issue or if there’s some
> better way to provide feedback.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Adam
>
>
>
>
>