RE: Representation of a secondary resource?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-webarch-comments-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-webarch-comments-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of ext Dan
> Connolly
> Sent: 27 October, 2004 15:48
> To: Jacek Kopecky
> Cc: public-webarch-comments@w3.org; Stuart Williams
> Subject: Re: Representation of a secondary resource?
> 
> 
> On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 04:35, Jacek Kopecky wrote:
> > Dan, I think I get your point about secondary resources not 
> constituting
> > a class of resources. It would be helpful IMO if the 
> document mentioned
> > how (of if), given a URI with a fragID, one can get to a 
> representation
> > of the resource. 
> 
> Well, the straightforward way to get a representation of such
> a resource is to find another URI for it, one that doesn't
> have a fragID, and dereference that URI.

And boy isn't it a good thing that we can use http: URIs to
identify any arbitrary resource, or else we'd never be able
to access any representations of 'secondary resources'
identified with fragids, no way, no how...

;-)

Patrick

Received on Wednesday, 27 October 2004 13:23:25 UTC