- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 11:55:18 -0400
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: public-webarch-comments@w3.org
- Message-Id: <44BA541E-269E-11D9-A9C9-000A95718F82@w3.org>
Le 25 oct. 2004, à 10:56, Dan Connolly a écrit : > It would help me/us a lot if, in the > interest of "promoting this document to every > computing school in the world" and such, you could > accept the work we've done on your comments, represented > in the editor's draft http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/webarch/ , > as sufficient, with an understanding that we'll continue > to consider them them as/when editorial resources become available > as we move forward. This comment has been done I think on only one comments. > Are you aware of any critical issues remaining? The only very strong issue I have is "URI ownership", notion of owners, etc. I see in the 2.2.2.1 URI ownership that it has been clarified a bit. I have to re read the whole document. Though I'm travelling tonight. So Let's move on. But be sure I'll come back on it ;) For the rest, I agree with regards to your answer [[[we'll continue to consider them them as/when editorial resources become available as we move forward.]]] Move on. Please. Be my guest. -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Monday, 25 October 2004 15:55:20 UTC