- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 15:23:13 -0400
- To: public-webarch-comments@w3.org
- Cc: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Message-id: <87y8i7dbvi.fsf@nwalsh.com>
* KD 012
3.6.1. URI Persistence
"""a URI should continue indefinitely to refer to that resource."""
That is not possible, because domain names are not defined and owned
for life. There are many social issues which are definitely harmful for
this part the World Wide Web Architecture. Asking for URI persistence
without solving the domain name issue is like asking people to go
university when they can own the price for it. See my issue KD 005.
Another problem with this motto. The "URI owner", owner can be legal
entity or a person.
If a legal entity (organization, company, etc) what's happening when
the legal entity disappears, what the URIs which relies on domain names
are supposed to become.
If a person, and this person dies (natural death or not), what the
URIs are supposed to become.
"Indefinitely" is just impossible. It's a completely false assertions,
except if the system is organized differently.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Great success is commoner than real
http://nwalsh.com/ | abilities.-- Vauvenargues
Received on Friday, 15 October 2004 19:23:39 UTC