On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 09:31:51PM -0400, Ian B. Jacobs wrote: > Although the TAG has not yet agreed to these proposals, > I welcome your comments about proposals that concern your > issues; please send those comments to public-webarch-comments@w3.org. In > particular, please indicate whether the text as proposed satisfies you > for that issue or how it might be edited to satisfy you. > o) From Kendall Clark > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2003/lc1209/issues.html#clark5 I'm happy with the proposed text as it currently stands. > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2003/lc1209/issues.html#clark7 I'm happier with this text, though the sentence "Just as promoting a shared vocabulary..." sets up an analogy I don't understand. > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2003/lc1209/issues.html#clark8 I cannot tell whether any change has been made to this text in the latest Editor's Draft; thus, I'll reserve comment till a later point. > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2003/lc1209/issues.html#clark11 This is moving in the right direction, IMO. > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2003/lc1209/issues.html#clark12 The language that the Editor plans to add sounds like an improvement. Please take these comments as advice to the Editor; I reserve the right to change my mind if the final text differs from this significantly. :> Best, Kendall ClarkReceived on Tuesday, 11 May 2004 08:30:25 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 26 January 2023 15:41:43 UTC