- From: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@acm.org>
- Date: 05 Mar 2004 00:18:39 +0100
- To: W3C TAG mailing list <public-webarch-comments@w3.org>
Re: Section 3.3.1, para 1 ("Per [URI], in order ...") This reader wonders at this point whether there are any constraints on the interpretation which the definer of a media type can place on fragment identifiers for the media type. Can one, consistent with Web architecture (if not necessarily with good design) define a media type (let us say application/sortes) where the meaning of a fragment identifier is identified by taking a checksum of the octet string returned, the conventional numerological value of the string used as the fragment identifier, multiplying the one by the other, and using the product to look up a passage in a copy of Vergil, with the stipulation that the meaning of the fragment identifier is "the meaning of the passage found by this method"?
Received on Thursday, 4 March 2004 18:19:30 UTC