- From: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@acm.org>
- Date: 05 Mar 2004 00:15:46 +0100
- To: W3C TAG mailing list <public-webarch-comments@w3.org>
Section 2 para 3 says When a representation uses a URI (instead of a local identifier) as an identifier, then it gains great power from the vastness of the choice of resources to which it can refer. This suggests that URIs have the advantage, compared to local identifiers, of being more numerous. But if we assume that both URIs and local identifiers are finite-length strings without any length restriction we need worry about, then both sets are enumerably infinite and there is a one-to-one mapping between them, so that they have exactly the same cardinality and neither is any more vast than the other. I suspect that what is meant here is that URIs have the advantage of being dereferenceable; this is true of some URIs, but not, I think, of all.
Received on Thursday, 4 March 2004 18:16:37 UTC