- From: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@acm.org>
- Date: 05 Mar 2004 00:11:40 +0100
- To: W3C TAG mailing list <public-webarch-comments@w3.org>
1.2.1 para 1 The first paragraph of this section is incomprehensible to me; I hope it can be rewritten. What does it mean to define an identifier without knowing what representations are available? Representations for what? For the identifier? For the thing identified? For something else entirely? In general, I would have thought that before assigning identifiers to things it would normally be useful to know what one was identifying. In programming languages, what one identifies with identifiers are typically representations of things (representations of integers, representations of character strings, etc.); in that context, it seems nonsensical to say without qualification (as is done here) that identifiers can be assigned without any knowledge about available representations; it is only a knowledge of the available representations and their characteristics that allows one to decide intelligently what different things need to be distinguished and thus what different things will need to be identified.
Received on Thursday, 4 March 2004 18:12:31 UTC