- From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 04:55:44 -0500
- To: Masayasu Ishikawa <mimasa@w3.org>
- Cc: public-webarch-comments@w3.org, dom@w3.org
- Message-Id: <1071222944.1945.19.camel@seabright>
On Fri, 2003-12-12 at 04:44, Masayasu Ishikawa wrote: > Picking a few more minor nits in References: > > The IRI reference says [3]: > > IRI > IETF Internationalized Resource Identifiers (IRIs), M. Duerst, > M. Suignard, Nov 2002. This IETF Internet Draft is available at > http://www.w3.org/International/iri-edit/draft-duerst-iri.html. > If this document is no longer available, refer to the home page > for Editing 'Internationalized Resource Identifiers (IRIs)'. > > It is indeed spelled "Duerst" in that Internet Draft, but in "Authors' > Addresses" section the author noted as follows [4]: > > (Note: Please write "Duerst" with u-umlaut wherever possible, for > example as "Dürst in XML and HTML.) > > I'd suggest to respect his wish. Yep. > The P3P10 reference [5] says "M. Marchiori, Editors", but there seems > to be only one editor. Dom, that improper plural also seems to be coming from the extractor. > There are references to IETF RFCs, but some of them refer to www.ietf.org > and others refer to www.rfc-editor.org . The latter seems authoritative, > but in any case, I'd suggest to refer to RFCs consistently. I hadn't realized that one domain was more authoritative than the other. I prefer ietf.org since it's shorter. I'll make them consistent with that unless I hear strong opinions that we should use the other one. Thanks again, _ Ian > [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-webarch-20031209/#IRI > [4] http://www.w3.org/International/iri-edit/draft-duerst-iri.html#rfc.authors > [5] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-webarch-20031209/#P3P10 > > Regards, -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260-9447
Received on Friday, 12 December 2003 04:55:45 UTC