W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webappsec@w3.org > November 2018

Re: CfC to adopt Feature Policy (deadline Nov. 7th)

From: Ian Clelland <iclelland@google.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 00:21:01 -0500
Message-ID: <CAK_TSXLghf4hWEb07LDc5L2OWtS4qEM3UZaTEia2JLGk0YwnRQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mike West <mkwst@google.com>
Cc: Giorgio Maone <giorgio@maone.net>, Terri Oda <terri.oda@intel.com>, public-webappsec@w3.org, dveditz@mozilla.com, weiler@w3.org, Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org>
Sorry, MIke -- this got delayed longer than I expected.

I just started an Intent to Migrate thread on Discourse (
https://discourse.wicg.io/t/intent-to-migrate-feature-policy/3203). Where
should the FPWD go?

On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 11:31 AM Ian Clelland <iclelland@google.com> wrote:

> Will do!
>
> Thanks, everyone, for the support :)
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 5:44 AM Mike West <mkwst@google.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks to you both, and to the more silent members of the majority. :) It
>> looks like we have confirmation of our consensus to adopt the document into
>> this group's set of deliverables.
>>
>> +Ian Clelland <iclelland@google.com>, would you mind sending an Intent
>> to Migrate <https://wicg.github.io/admin/intent-to-migrate.html> to the
>> WICG, and generating an FPWD version of the document so we can follow this
>> up with a CfC for publication?
>>
>> -mike
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 1:00 AM Giorgio Maone <giorgio@maone.net> wrote:
>>
>>> On 06/11/18 21:03, Oda, Terri wrote:
>>>
>>> I'll add my voice to the silent support chorus (since I know it's
>>> sometimes nice to have an indicator that someone actually read the email
>>> and associated documents): this does indeed look like it fits the charter
>>> and I approve of the adoption.
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> -- G
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 1:29 AM Mike West <mkwst@google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey folks!
>>>>
>>>> As discussed at TPAC
>>>> <https://www.w3.org/2018/10/23-webappsec-minutes.html#item08>, there's
>>>> interest in migrating Feature Policy
>>>> <https://wicg.github.io/feature-policy/> out of the WICG, and into
>>>> WebAppSec. There were no objections at the time, with general agreement
>>>> that it fit into our existing charter's scope
>>>> <https://www.w3.org/2011/webappsec/charter-2017.html> pretty cleanly.
>>>> I'd like to make sure the rest of the group feels similarly.
>>>>
>>>> This, therefore, is a call for consensus regarding Feature Policy's
>>>> adoption into this working group. If you have any concerns with this
>>>> adoption, please respond here by November 7th. Silence will be interpreted
>>>> as support. :)
>>>>
>>>> If we generally agree to adopt the deliverable, the next steps will be
>>>> to send an Intent to Migrate
>>>> <https://wicg.github.io/admin/intent-to-migrate.html> to the WICG, and
>>>> to move into another CfC to publish the incubated document as a FPWD. Ah,
>>>> process...
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> -mike
>>>>
>>>
>>>
Received on Wednesday, 28 November 2018 05:21:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 28 November 2018 05:21:36 UTC