- From: W3C Webmaster via GitHub API <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2018 17:00:14 +0000
- To: public-webappsec@w3.org
- Message-Id: <E1estTC-00068v-31@uranus.w3.org>
Issues ------ * w3c/webappsec-subresource-integrity (+1/-0/💬4) 1 issues created: - A new IntegrityCheckFailure event (by ScottHelme) https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-subresource-integrity/issues/77 3 issues received 4 new comments: - #77 A new IntegrityCheckFailure event (2 by ScottHelme, mozfreddyb) https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-subresource-integrity/issues/77 - #20 Consider integrity check violation reporting (1 by ScottHelme) https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-subresource-integrity/issues/20 - #21 Consider integrity enforcement of iframe (1 by BigBlueHat) https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-subresource-integrity/issues/21 * w3c/webappsec-csp (+1/-0/💬3) 1 issues created: - Add directive similar to ‘X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff’? (by valtlai) https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-csp/issues/298 3 issues received 3 new comments: - #298 Add directive similar to ‘X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff’? (1 by jonathanKingston) https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-csp/issues/298 - #116 Allow nonce-source to be used in more directives. (1 by frederikbosch) https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-csp/issues/116 - #45 Further granularity of unsafe-inline styles (1 by arturjanc) https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-csp/issues/45 [CORE] * w3c/webappsec-credential-management (+0/-0/💬2) 1 issues received 2 new comments: - #3 CREDENTIAL: Reconsider the top-level browsing context limitation. (2 by apowers313, mikewest) https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-credential-management/issues/3 [CREDENTIAL] * w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts (+2/-1/💬2) 2 issues created: - "Is an environment settings object contextually secure?" does not work for worklets (by annevk) https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts/issues/57 - "Is an environment settings object contextually secure?" does not deal with nested workers (by annevk) https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts/issues/56 1 issues received 2 new comments: - #56 "Is an environment settings object contextually secure?" does not deal with nested workers (2 by bzbarsky) https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts/issues/56 1 issues closed: - Should secure iframes of insecure parents be considered secure? Spec is self-contradictory. https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts/issues/54 Pull requests ------------- * w3c/webappsec-csp (+0/-0/💬1) 1 pull requests received 1 new comments: - #287 Introduce 'webrtc-src'. (1 by patrickkettner) https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-csp/pull/287 * w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts (+0/-1/💬4) 1 pull requests received 4 new comments: - #55 Reintroduce the dependency on a parent's security. (4 by annevk, estark37, bzbarsky) https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts/pull/55 1 pull requests merged: - Reintroduce the dependency on a parent's security. https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts/pull/55 Repositories tracked by this digest: ----------------------------------- * https://github.com/w3c/webappsec * https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-subresource-integrity * https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-csp * https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-mixed-content * https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-upgrade-insecure-requests * https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-credential-management * https://github.com/w3c/permissions * https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-referrer-policy * https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-secure-contexts * https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-clear-site-data * https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-cowl * https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-epr * https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-suborigins
Received on Monday, 5 March 2018 17:00:26 UTC