Re: Reports feature violates the same-origin policy

I was being somewhat snarky; I'm not actually proposing we change the
reporting content-type. CSP's report-uri uses a Content-Type of
application/csp-report. If a hypothetical JSON-consuming server is checking
Content-Type they should already be fine. If they aren't then a malicious
web site's ability to hit the server with text/plain JSON payloads would
pose similar risk. I wouldn't want to generically whitelist
application/csp-report if that means arbitrary xhr/fetch could also use
those. At least with a real CSP report there are restrictions on the
possible data that's sent that are unlikely to match some other service's
JSON format.

In CSP 3 report-uri is deprecated in favor of report-to. Report-to uses the
reporting service spec which defines a content-type of application/report,
and also that the request mode is "cors". Isn't that basically what you
want? Can we leave the report-uri behavior alone as a historical artifact
of 2011 spec making?

-
​Dan Veditz​

Received on Wednesday, 15 February 2017 20:10:17 UTC