Requesting security review of ARIA in HTML

Hello WebAppSec,

The WebPlat WG would welcome your review of the ARIA in HTML spec [1], 
as we begin preparing for transition to CR.

We've completed the security/privacy questionnaire (answers below).

If possible we'd like your comments before 30th April. If this doesn't 
look feasible though, let me know?

We prefer comments to be filed as issues on Github [1], but feel free to 
send a summary and/or email pointing to the Github issues to 
public-html@w3.org (especially if you have no comments at all).

Thanks.
Léonie
[1] https://www.w3.org/TR/html-aria/
[2] https://github.com/w3c/html-aria/issues/

Answers to questionnaire:
• 3.1 Does this specification deal with personally-identifiable 
information?
◦ no

• 3.2 Does this specification deal with high-value data?
◦ no

• 3.3 Does this specification introduce new state for an origin that 
persists across browsing sessions?
◦ no

• 3.4 Does this specification expose persistent, cross-origin state to 
the web?
◦ no

• 3.5 Does this specification expose any other data to an origin that it 
doesn’t currently have access to?
◦ no

• 3.6 Does this specification enable new script execution/loading 
mechanisms?
◦ no

• 3.7 Does this specification allow an origin access to a user’s location?
◦ no

• 3.8 Does this specification allow an origin access to sensors on a 
user’s device?
◦ no

• 3.9 Does this specification allow an origin access to aspects of a 
user’s local computing environment?
◦ no

• 3.10 Does this specification allow an origin access to other devices?
◦ no

• 3.11 Does this specification allow an origin some measure of control 
over a user agent’s native UI?
◦ no

• 3.12 Does this specification expose temporary identifiers to the web?
◦ no

• 3.13 Does this specification distinguish between behavior in 
first-party and third-party contexts?
◦ no

• 3.14 How should this specification work in the context of a user 
agent’s "incognito" mode?
◦ N/A

• 3.15 Does this specification persist data to a user’s local device?
◦ no

• 3.16 Does this specification have a "Security Considerations" and 
"Privacy Considerations" section?
◦ no

• 3.17 Does this specification allow downgrading default security 
characteristics?
◦ no

-- 
@LeonieWatson tink.uk Carpe diem

Received on Monday, 13 February 2017 11:58:13 UTC