W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webappsec@w3.org > March 2016

Re: Alternative proposal for the form signing using client-certificate

From: Mitar <mmitar@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 21:42:41 -0800
Message-ID: <CAKLmikPcdVhkVCh01paauHcfRzn9JdegqF7H3HLoSzCcSJ19AA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
Cc: Crispin Cowan <crispin@microsoft.com>, "timeless@gmail.com" <timeless@gmail.com>, "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>
Hi!

On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 9:27 PM, Anders Rundgren
<anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com> wrote:
> In my old country (Sweden) I can log in to (almost) any of the national
> banks
> (assuming I have an account there), to all e-government services as well as
> sending money in real-time only using a phone number as account identifier,
> all based on Mobile BankID which is an "App" + X.509 certificate. S/MIME?
> N/A (which says something about the state of eID "standardization").

Can you sign legally bound online petitions? Can you yourself develop
a platform where people could sign such petitions?


Mitar

-- 
http://mitar.tnode.com/
https://twitter.com/mitar_m
Received on Saturday, 12 March 2016 05:43:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:54:18 UTC