On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 12:00 AM, Marcos Caceres <marcos@marcosc.com> wrote: > On August 26, 2016 at 4:54:13 PM, Anne van Kesteren (annevk@annevk.nl) > wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 1:04 AM, Jeffrey Yasskin wrote: > > > What do folks think? > > > > That furthering the idea that publication is somehow tied to agreement > > is wrong. Just publish and don't use publication as justification for > > implementation decisions. > > I agree. Let's just mark things clearly where we are seeking feedback > or debating things. As long as things are clearly marked as > contentious/at-risk, it should not be a problem (it's less harmful > than having a rotting spec on TR). > If there aren't any dissenting opinions by Monday, I'll be comfortable with merging #99.Received on Friday, 26 August 2016 18:12:50 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:54:21 UTC