Re: WebAuthn API Specification Review

On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 9:34 PM, Anthony Nadalin <tonynad@microsoft.com> wrote:
> To clarify we are aiming for CR at the TPAC meeting.

Based on a quick review (I submitted some feedback via GitHub), it
doesn't quite seem editorially ready for that.

It's also still unclear to me that we as a community embraced
extending the reach of cookies (public suffix reach) to other APIs.
Last I checked, e.g., exposing something as simple as an API for
public suffix was still taboo.


-- 
https://annevankesteren.nl/

Received on Wednesday, 17 August 2016 09:17:37 UTC