- From: Daniel Veditz <dveditz@mozilla.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:17:33 -0700
- To: Neil Matatall <oreoshake@github.com>
- Cc: "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 1 April 2016 00:18:02 UTC
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Neil Matatall <oreoshake@github.com> wrote: > During the last teleconference [1], we discussed the future of using > `*` as a source expression in a `block-non-sri-resources` context. > Whether this lands as part of CSP, in a separate header, etc. we > should decide if `*` is allowed as a value. > ​We have the option of not deciding yet: '*' currently isn't a whole lot shorter than the only supported values of ​'script' 'style'​. Later, when we do introduce all those other possible values we can also introduce '*'. That will introduce the problem of future websites using '*' and old browsers not understanding it. That's probably OK given that the two browser engines which currently support SRI update quickly. In practice we should be fine. -Dan Veditz
Received on Friday, 1 April 2016 00:18:02 UTC