Re: CSP3 as a polylithic set of modules?

On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Joel Weinberger <jww@chromium.org> wrote:

> While I like the maintainability of this proposal, it seems like it might
> complicated the versioning that Dev has proposed in the past (that I really
> like). Namely, for each sub-spec, you'd have to tie it into a specific CSP
> version you'd like it to be in, and tracking all of that information down
> across specs might be difficult. But if we want versioning, maybe it's
> still worth figuring out how to do it well across distributed chunks like
> this.
>

I see Mike's proposal as a way towards avoiding versioning. I think it is
worth trying to avoid versioning. It's not clear what issues that people
are proposing to solve with versioning, though.

Cheers,
Brian