- From: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 17:18:48 +0200
- To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>, Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com>
- Cc: public-web-security@w3.org, Tony Arcieri <bascule@gmail.com>, Brad Hill <hillbrad@gmail.com>, "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>, Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
On 2015-09-23 15:57, Harry Halpin wrote: > On 09/23/2015 03:42 AM, Anders Rundgren wrote: >> In my opinion the #1 problem with this discussion is that when you >> mention things that doesn't match the SOP vision like the fact that Android-, >> Apple-, and Samsung-Pay doesn't work on the Web, dead silence is all you get. > <ad hominem attacks> > </ad hominem attacks> > In particular, it is likely more productive for various non-SOP schemes > to find a way to adopt to SOP in a principled manner and so maintain > security and privacy properties. Payment schemes, identity schemes, and > the rest should and can do this. This topic has never been discussed in for example: http://www.w3.org/Payments/IG/ Maybe Jeff should take down the flag http://www.w3.org/2015/01/banker_payments.pdf before it gets too embarrassing? Anders
Received on Wednesday, 23 September 2015 15:19:31 UTC