- From: Göran AP Eriksson <gaperik@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 11:09:51 +0200
- To: "Nottingham, Mark" <mnotting@akamai.com>
- Cc: Brad Hill <hillbrad@gmail.com>, Ben Gidley <ben@gidley.co.uk>, "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFAFLMF74K4m8RqF79DRzs0r9ZU2L+kpPN01poMqeppY8y0KUA@mail.gmail.com>
Just to handshake: The "problem" is limited to *Live DASH*, not any offline DASH usage? BR Göran 2015-09-17 22:42 GMT+02:00 Nottingham, Mark <mnotting@akamai.com>: > Hey, > > Sorry for the delay, but some feedback forwarded from one of our DASH > folks: > > Regarding this statement, > > > The "opaque" response prevents direct access to the Response data. > Similarly, the SourceBuffer object does not allow direct access to the data > - this is only passed on to the audio/video decoders, same as the existing > <audio>/<video>/<source> tags today. I realize this may prevent access to > the full capabilities of MSE; indeed, some use cases require access to the > content in order to do adaptive streaming. > > The "some use cases" turn out to be the majority of future anticipated > live service streaming. The DASH-AVC/264 Interop Guidelines v3.0 < > http://dashif.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/DASH-IF-IOP-v3.0.pdf> split > live services in to two major groups; those which rely on MPD update only, > and those which rely on MPD updater and the ability to parse segments to > retrieve both inband events and timestamp information. > > 1. There are in-stream event messages are carried in there 'emsg' box of > the ISOBMFF container. MSE-based players must parse the XHR response and > extract these messages prior to appending the data to the source buffer. > These messages are used to convey triggers for ad insertion, manifest > refresh, stream associated metadata such as sports scores etc. > > 2. SegmentTimeline mode of live operation can be conducted in such a > manner that the address of the the next segment is constructed by parsing > the tdft timestamp of the latest segment described in the manifest. This is > an efficient mode of live stream operation, as the client only needs to > download the manifest once (until signaled to refresh it for ad insertion > or EOS) > > If the proposal is implemented then a live service which is targeting a > mixture of MSE and non-MSE clients would be forced to comply with the > lowest common denominator (MSE with opaque response data) and would be > unable to use inband events. Since the majority of future distributions are > likely to involve MSE clients, this proposal effectively limits live DASH > deployments to their simplest mode of operation and negates a body of > features based on inband event signalling. > > Hope this helps, > > > > On 21 Jul 2015, at 12:11 pm, Brad Hill <hillbrad@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > There was a proposal of this sort (not a blanket exception, but a safer > way to allow for video-over-HTTP to HTTPS pages) by Ryan Sleevi, the start > of the thread can be found here: > > > > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webappsec/2015Feb/0371.html > > > > We discussed this last week at our face-to-face in Berlin, and the feel > of the room seemed to be that the proposal was technically sound, we > weren't sure who exactly the customers of it would be. I think Ryan had > Netflix in mind given their previous reluctance to move to TLS for > delivery, but with that resolved, nobody has publicly stepped up as wanting > to adopt such a solution. Our informal rule of thumb in this group is that > we've wanted expressions of interest from two "customers" of a feature > before we start working on something. > > > > Ben, do you maintain a player like this, or know someone who does, who > would be willing to examine and comment on Ryan's proposal? > > > > thanks, > > > > Brad Hill > > > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 1:45 AM Ben Gidley <ben@gidley.co.uk> wrote: > > I'd like to ask if you've considered how this proposal effects MPEG-DASH > players using Media Source Extensions? > > > > I've been using DASH players and they generally all break with today's > behavior on Chrome/Firefox is you're using a HTTPS page with a HTTP CDN for > the video content. This is because they mostly fetch content via XHR for > processing in their media source extension. > > > > It's not very desirable to push all video over SSL (as it breaks in > network caching commonly deployed by Telco's/ISP's) - is it possible to > consider a scheme to allow a media source extension to tech video? > > > > > > > > -- > > Ben Gidley > > > > www.gidley.co.uk > > ben@gidley.co.uk > > -- > Mark Nottingham mnot@akamai.com https://www.mnot.net/ > >
Received on Saturday, 19 September 2015 09:10:23 UTC