- From: Mike West <mkwst@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 15:53:55 +0200
- To: Brad Hill <hillbrad@gmail.com>, Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org>
- Cc: "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 10 September 2015 13:54:43 UTC
It sounds like most folks are in favor of splitting. I'll slap together a strawman of what a split might look like, and then we can argue about it a bit more before we ask Wendy to do a lot of work on our behalf (hi, Wendy :) ). -mike -- Mike West <mkwst@google.com>, @mikewest Google Germany GmbH, Dienerstrasse 12, 80331 München, Germany, Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891, Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg, Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Christine Elizabeth Flores (Sorry; I'm legally required to add this exciting detail to emails. Bleh.) On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 1:35 AM, Brad Hill <hillbrad@gmail.com> wrote: > submodules make my mind melt. so many incantations to make them work > correctly. please no, I am just not smart enough to deal. > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 2:43 PM Ángel González <angel@16bits.net> wrote: > >> There could be split repositories with each on them included as >> submodules of w3c/webappsec. IMHO that should please people wanting it >> in both ways. >> >> >> >>
Received on Thursday, 10 September 2015 13:54:43 UTC