W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webappsec@w3.org > September 2015

Re: Split the `w3c/webappsec` respository?

From: Eric Mill <eric@konklone.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 14:40:37 -0400
Message-ID: <CANBOYLVnSwfPqSEqXc8tn2a-nGEXykNz8kZcFNJQ5XjHJoQeGQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Oda, Terri" <terri.oda@intel.com>
Cc: Mike West <mkwst@google.com>, Francois Marier <francois@mozilla.com>, Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org>, "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>
You can probably write GitHub and request they transfer
https://github.com/webappsec to you. They're pretty quick and good about
doing that if the account is truly idle.

On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Oda, Terri <terri.oda@intel.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 9:18 PM, Mike West <mkwst@google.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 12:12 AM, Francois Marier <francois@mozilla.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Can we keep the name "webappsec" in the repo name? Something like
>>> "w3c/webappsec-sri" and "w3c/webappsec-cowl". That way it will be easy
>>> to find / browse all of the repos related to our working group.
>>>
>>
>> It's not clear to me that that would help anyone who wasn't in this
>> group. :)
>>
>>
> Actually, I think that does have the potential to be helpful in that it'll
> make it easier for people to figure out which mailing list to take comments
> to if they don't want to use github issues.  This could equally be achieved
> with good readme files, of course, but there's something to be said for
> making it clear that there's a w3c working group behind the ideas.
>
>  Terri
>



-- 
konklone.com | @konklone <https://twitter.com/konklone>
Received on Wednesday, 9 September 2015 18:41:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:54:15 UTC