W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webappsec@w3.org > November 2015

Re: referrer-policy attribute

From: Jochen Eisinger <eisinger@google.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2015 22:37:48 +0000
Message-ID: <CALjhuie43pHueB2T7DtWVs4HHGLRbOs59eYgtwDUg1SJm0eXGQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Franziskus Kiefer <fkiefer@mozilla.com>, Scott Beardsley <sbeards@yahoo-inc.com>
Cc: Mike West <mkwst@google.com>, "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>
The pull requests stopped coming in :)

Will you continue to work on this?

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 12:29 AM Franziskus Kiefer <fkiefer@mozilla.com>
wrote:

> Thanks Scott, looks good to me. Let me know if you want assistance with
> the other two issues.
>
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Scott Beardsley <sbeards@yahoo-inc.com>
> wrote:
>
>> The original PR kind of exploded into solving many problems. I'd like to
>> address them individually via separate PRs if that is OK. Here is the first
>> one to rename "referrer" to "referrerpolicy" for attribute-based
>> delivery[1]. I'll try to followup with additional PRs for the other issues
>> mentioned:
>>
>>  * which takes priority when encountering: both rel=noreferrer and
>> referrerpolicy attributes
>>  * addressing the iframe use case
>>
>> Scott
>> --
>> [1] https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-referrer-policy/pull/1
>>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, October 26, 2015 5:09 AM, Franziskus Kiefer <
>> fkiefer@mozilla.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Scott (the original author of the pull request, CC'ed) wanted to work on
>> it again. But I'm not sure when.
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Jochen Eisinger <eisinger@google.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Do you intend to continue to work on the pull request? If not, please
>> close it, then I'll spec it myself.
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 9:05 PM Mike West <mkwst@google.com> wrote:
>>
>> +Jochen
>> -mike
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Franziskus Kiefer <fkiefer@mozilla.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > we at Mozilla would like to finalise the implementation of the referrer
>> > policy attribute but currently are blocked by the renaming issue. A pull
>> > request has been submitted to the old github repo a while ago [1]. So it
>> > would be awesome if a decision on this could be reached soon such that
>> the
>> > changes can make its way into the spec.
>> >
>> > [1] https://github.com/w3c/webappsec/pull/435
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Franziskus
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Monday, 9 November 2015 22:38:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:54:16 UTC